• RatMaster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d say it’s more like disguised feudalism. We’re all peasants for the few kings and queens that have all the money at the top.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think people actually agree on the definition of capitalism itself, I just looked it up and was a little surprised how definitive it is:

      an economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit.

      If you asked whether capitalism is a political system, at least in my random polling, 2 out of 9 respondents said No.

        • Platomus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Capitalism is an economic system with as little government intervention possible.

          Doesn’t the bolded part make it a political system then?

            • Platomus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lobbiest that work for companies do that constantly because of Capitalism. It’s an entire field of work.

                • MrMonkey@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  fascist capitalist systems

                  Pedantic man to the rescue! Fascism was a “third way” from “capitalism” and “communism”. Fascism means state control (if not ownership) of “the means of production”.

        • viliam@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Government intervention goes the other way: capitalists like intervening into government.

  • A2PKXG@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    To all the people here ranting about monetary debt: its not an issue. Money isn’t designed to hold value in the long term. It’s a feature, not a bug.

    It’s just really unfortunate for those who play the game as if money were an asset. It’s meant for transactions, not for storage.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, because it’s also a giant Ponzi scheme. We pick up new debt today to pay off debt from yesterday, and we hope expanding GDP and inflation will always offset the difference.

        • Sarcastik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s used so interchangeably these days that I’m inclined to say no, but an oversimplication is that a ponzi scheme is always illegal and is more detailed in its mechanics (as named after conman Charles Ponzi). Wheras a pyramid scheme (or more commonly known: MLM) can actually be legal depending on how it’s constructed.

          A ponzi scheme involves a conman who scams his customers by taking massive profits from their investors and requires a constant stream of new investors to pay off the old ones. This is fraud.

          A pyramid scheme usually involves some type of product and pays huge bonuses to the recruiters at the top for bringing in more people below them from the investment of new people below them. This is taxing uneducated people but can be legal.

          TLDR: capitalism is more akin to a pyramid scheme and not at all like a ponzi scheme.

  • viliam@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some retirement saving schemes may be a pyramid scheme. When the population growth stagnates, there will not be enough young people to produce for everyone.

  • Mr PoopyButthole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly one of the reasons I fell for a pyramid scheme coming out of high school.

    A friend invited me and I went to shit on it and get him out, but the main guy’s whole thing was “everything is a pyramid scheme, at least here you have the chance to build a pyramid beneath you.”

    Obviously there were other reasons as old as time, but the argument of “so what, your ‘regular job’ is already a pyramid scheme you can’t win” was pretty rattling to a teenager in 2011.

    • hihellobyeoh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference between a pyramid scheme and a good business is where your money comes from, in a pyramid scheme it comes from the people at the bottom of the pyramid, in a business it comes from selling goods and/or services, that’s not saying I agree with big business, but one is profiting off of legitimate customers, the other is profiting off it’s own “employees”. I nearly got caught into one a few years ago too, until I realized what it was, at that point they had only taken a couple $100 for the interview and sign up stage, i had to block my card for them to never get access again, because even though i didnt complete sign up, thwy kept charging me monthly

        • solstice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Imagine you own a goose that lays golden eggs. It lays one golden egg per year. How much would you sell it for? Probably not one golden egg, but definitely you’d sell if for a million gold eggs. You’d probably settle for maybe 5? 10? 15? Something like that.

          Suppose the goose only lays one egg per year now (or none at all!) but it’s still young and most people expect it to start laying four or five or even ten or twenty eggs per year in a few years from now. It’s impossible to tell for sure how many it’ll lay over its life, or when that will happen, or if it will happen at all. NOW how much do you sell it for?

          That’s the stock market.

          A bunch of investors think a bunch of gooses will start laying a ton more golden eggs soon, and they’re willing to pay big bucks now in exchange for the possibility of that in the future. This isn’t a pyramid scheme or a zero sum game or anything like that. It’s just a prediction of the future which may or may not be correct, and only time will tell.

  • solstice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It fundamentally is NOT a pyramid scheme. In a pyramid scheme there is no actual product or service of value and simply extracts wealth from the people in lower tiers. Value, or wealth, is simply the byproduct of an equitable transaction between two or more parties.

    • bendak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Transactions are often not equitable, and most wealth bubbles up to the people on the top tiers.

      • solstice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Markets are not always fair or efficient but that doesn’t mean capitalism is a pyramid scheme. It is still very much the opposite.

        • KirbyQK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unregulated capitalism places all of the power in the hands of the wealthy. Even with the amount of regulation in place, the last 4 decades has irrefutably proven that. The transfer of wealth from the bottom 95% to the top 5% has has been insane.

          The only reason we need so much regulation is because people are garbage and if they can gain something for nothing, they will. You cannot consider the pure idea of capitalism without also considering the reality of human nature, that it is inherently going to create a pyramid scheme like situation where the top transfer power and wealth to themselves in the largest quantities they can, in spite of pesky things like laws and taxes.

          • markr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes that is true, and you can view wealth distribution as pyramid shaped, but that is not what a pyramid scheme means. As noted the system is very good at producing massive amounts of commodities, distributing them all over the planet, and exchanging them for your labor. If capitalism did nothing useful it would have disappeared long ago.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes Marx formalized this opinion.

    It’s the owners of the land and the means of production that control all of the wealth.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now it’s the owners of the holding companies who own the owners of all the rest doing the controlling.

  • halfelfhalfreindeer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How so though? This sounds like a statement that’s meant to be flashy but doesn’t actually hold up. Pyramid schemes are characterized by a) an eventual lack of ability to recruit more people, b) recruitment rather than a product or a service being the driver, and c) a person at the bottom left with nothing, including recourse. Capitalism, even completely free capitalism, doesn’t work like that unless you specifically rig it to do so. That’s called “corruption”.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      an eventual lack of ability to recruit more people

      Global population growth is slowing and predicted to halt within the next few decades.

      The modern economy has always relied on an environment of growth, which will now end. In some ways this resembles a pyramid scheme; in the past anyone making investments in the economy could count on a larger new generation of people coming into the market needing to exchange their labor for those hoarded resources. Since this is no longer going to be the case, new entrants to the market are going to be getting a lot less for their effort than they may have expected based on past trends.

    • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like half the population of the world are poor, every industry is using behind the doors sweatshops. Essentially slavery. While not a perfect synonym, I think it makes sense

  • walnutwalrus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    in that there are hierarchical meritocratic levels of achievement?

    or that there are extractive processes which benefit the top at the expense of those lower?

  • viliam@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Capitalism is a scheme where finite raw materials are being extracted and where finite nature is being destroyed - both on the planetary scale; once we reach the end, it will be the end.