Environmental campaigners have called on the government to learn from its own successes after official figures showed the use of single-use supermarket plastic bags had fallen 98% since retailers in England began charging for them in 2015.

Annual distribution of plastic carrier bags by seven leading grocery chains plummeted from 7.6bn in 2014 to 133m last year, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said on Monday.

  • Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reminder that the biggest by far source of micro plastic in the air we breathe comes from tires. And there is zero research being done to find an alternative

      • Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but synthetic textile is very broad and can be many products across different industries. A tire is an end product and if you find an alternative for that, you knock off the most contributing product of micro plastic.

      • mayonaise_met@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Metal tires and metal roads. Kind of slippery, so we might need to make some sort of ridges to guide our vehicle’s direction. Stopping will still be hard, but if we just lock cars together and do it all at once it might be feasible.

        • Polar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I see your from feddit.nl, which makes your comment make sense, but you really need to realize that in many places in the world, the way the town’s and cities were built, it’s just impossible to implement public transit, and biking isn’t really an alternative.

          Or places where public transit is a thing, it is really inconvenient.

          My girlfriend can drive to work in 30 minutes. Taking the bus takes her over an hour. So instead of a 1 hour drive each day, she’s on the bus for 2.5 hours + waiting + the inconvenience of the buses not being on schedule + the buses shutting down at midnight

          It’s great if you can commit an extra 1.5 hours every day just to sit on a bus, but she can’t. Not to mention that’s just going to work. If she needed to stop by for groceries, pet food, doctors appointments, etc, she’s adding an insane amount of time in between by having to switch buses.

          I know cars are bad, but going to work + running errands legit wastes a good 3+ hours vs taking a car. That’s a massive chunk of wasted time. She has shit she needs to do at home, she can’t spend a quarter of her day sitting on public transit.

          • treefingers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Imagine if the public transport system wasn’t rubbish and your girlfriend could travel in the same 30 minutes?

            Public transport isn’t the problem, it’s the solution

            • pfannkuchen_gesicht@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Really depends where you are how feasible it is. Where I live we have a great public transport system. Most stations can be reached within 10 minutes when walking and there’s a tram leaving the station every 10 minutes. So getting anywhere in the city is fairly quick and wait times are mininal in most cases.
              Travel outside the city and it’s a whole different story and unfortunately there isn’t really a good way to fix it. Just increasing the frequency of busses/trains isn’t feasible because 90% of the rides will be empty at this point which makes no sense.

            • Polar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay. I’ll tell my city to just tear down half of it so they can build a better system.

              Like I said, not all towns and cities were designed for it. It’s not something you can just plop in centuries down the road. The world doesn’t work that way.

              Any new development should have public transit in mind. Old development can’t really be retrofitted. It’s like you missed my entire comment.

              • Vii@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                In many places the cities were retrofitted for car centric infrastructure already, why couldnt it happen again?

              • median_user@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Car-centric cities waste tonnes of space on parking which sits empty most or all of the time. Improving them requires less knocking stuff down and more filling in the gaps.

                Luckily your city doesn’t have to pay for this - since property developers will do it for you to make money for themselves. You just need to fix the regulatory barriers: remove parking minimums and legalise mixed-use zoning.

                If you want to accelerate the process, your local government can adopt the Japanese model: build rail or light rail and then develop dense areas around or above it. This is generally profitable but requires taking on a decent amount of initial risk.

                So it can be done. But sitting around grumbling about how a better future is impossible because everything has to stay how it is right now won’t get us there.

                • Polar@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So it can be done. But sitting around grumbling about how a better future is impossible because everything has to stay how it is right now won’t get us there.

                  Conveniently ignoring the part where I said new developments should absolutely have public transit in mind.

          • mondoman712@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You just described how bad the public transport where you live is, not why it can’t be better. We 100% can and should be building better public transport & active transport, as well as building places with better land use for these.

          • mackwinston@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then your (presumably Canada) country needs to start re-doing the cities so they aren’t dependent on private cars. NL was also going that way in the 1970s until they changed direction. The best time to do it would have been back then, but the second best time to do it is start now.

            • Polar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Who is going to pay? The Canadians who live in the most expensive country in the world and cannot afford to live anymore?

              You guys are ignorant as hell lol

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When the petrol car ban comes in, this could take care of itself as everybody finds themselves priced out of driving.

        We’ll need a really good public transport system to replace it, but we won’t get that either because we’re too poor to care about.

        • mondoman712@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of people are already priced out of driving. We need to be building that public transport network, along with active transport infrastructure and better land use anyway.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            With petrol you can always get a £500 banger, run it into the ground over the next year or two and repeat.

            With electric it starts at about 5000-6000, and you’ll be paying £500 a year just to rent the battery. It’s the batteries that are going to keep that out of reach of the poorest.

            • mondoman712@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              And you still need insurance, fuel etc on top of that, and your £500 banger isn’t going to be very reliable.

              You can get a decent bike for £50 or a bus ticket for £2. The problem is in a lot of the country it isn’t safe to cycle and the buses are shit, so we need to fix those things to have transport that works for everyone (and doesn’t create microplastics).

            • ChromeSkull@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Where are you getting this battery rental from? I only knew of Renault and the very first Nissan leafs that did battery lease.

            • MidgePhoto@photog.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              @Blackmist @mondoman712
              I only know of Renault leasing the battery in the Zoe.

              Otherwise, the battery is part of the car and sold as part of it, with a guarantee.

              I think your £500 banger has to be years older than any large number of BEVs, and will cost you more to scrap after you ture of repairing it.

        • MidgePhoto@photog.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @Blackmist @mondoman712
          It isn’t a ban, there are huge numbers of them, of which less than a tenth are new any year.

          That tenth of new car buyers can keep last year’s car, or buy a second hand car, but these are new car buyers, they’ll buy a new EV, mostly, or their firm will.

          2,3,4…10 owners down the line, look forward to a used EV coming your way, a couple…10 years after no new petrol cars are made.